The best financial services for your money!

Download this e-book and optimize your finances and save money by using the best financial services available in Switzerland!

Download The FREE e-book

Can you retire early with Swiss Stocks and Bonds?

Baptiste Wicht | Updated: |

(Disclosure: Some of the links below may be affiliate links)

In the past, I ran simulations to see if we could retire early using Swiss stocks. At that time, I discovered that the returns on Swiss stocks were not great.

Unfortunately (or fortunately), there was an issue with my original data, where many years were missing dividend returns. I now have better data, including total returns every month.

I also have data for Swiss bonds for the same period so that we can run more interesting simulations now.

This article will see whether we can use the 4% rule in Switzerland with Swiss stocks.

The new data

As mentioned in the introduction, the data mentioned in the previous Swiss Stocks article was incomplete. Many years did not include dividend returns, an essential part of the total returns. This was making Swiss Stocks worse than they were. Fortunately, this was pointed out by one of my readers.

This reader also pointed me to one source of monthly returns for the Swiss Stock market. The Swiss Federal Institute of Zurich wrote an article: Disaggregation of Financial Market Data. This article compiled monthly returns for Swiss stocks and bonds (among others) from 1926 to 2010.

This is the only source I know that has monthly returns for Swiss Stocks and Bonds for an extended period.

I completed the data from 2010 to 2023 using the historical daily data provided by SIX, which manages several Swiss Stocks and Bonds indexes.

So, the data is now complete. Therefore, I can run some simulations. If you are interested in the details of the simulations, you can read my article about the updated results of the Trinity Study. I use the same tool and procedure.

All simulations use Swiss inflation and rebalance the portfolio yearly. The fees are assumed to be 0.10% per year.

So far, I have not been able to obtain monthly returns before 1926. But if I do, I will run more simulations with more historical data. Nevertheless, almost 100 years of historical data is good enough.

Swiss stocks only

First, we will do simulations using only Swiss stocks. This is mainly to see how Swiss stocks performed historically. And this allows us to compare with the old data that I had.

So, here are the results for ten years.

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 10 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 10 Years

Ten years is an extremely short retirement period. This simulation acts as a simple validation for the data. As we can see, any withdrawal rate between 3% and 5% would be fine for ten years.

So, we must go to 20 years to see what happens.

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 20 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 20 Years

Here, the results start to be interesting. We can see that the success rates are excellent, up to 4.50%, and then begin to fall quickly. That still shows that for 20 years, we could use the 4% rule for Swiss stocks.

In practice, 30 years of retirement is when retirement simulations are interesting.

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 30 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 30 Years

We can see some interesting things. First, the 4% withdrawal rate would not have worked for this period, with less than a 90% chance of success. On the other hand, a more conservative withdrawal rate of 3.80% would still yield interesting results.

We will see what happens when do a longer retirement of 40 years:

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 40 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 40 Years

We can see that we are reaching the limits of Swiss stocks. Indeed, we would need a withdrawal rate below 3.60% to have more than 90% success rate. Swiss stocks did not have enough returns to sustain very long periods.

Finally, we can also see what happens at 50 years.

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 50 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 50 Years

While the results are not great, they are also not horrible. We would still get more than a 90% chance of success with a 3.40% withdrawal rate. This withdrawal rate is very conservative, but some people use low withdrawal rates.

Finally, let’s compare the results for 50 years for the two datasets. The new dataset has total returns, while the old dataset has been missing dividends for about 60 years.

Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 50 Years
Retirement Success Rates with Swiss Stocks - 50 Years

This shows the importance of dividends in total returns. Without dividends, the chances of success would be minimal for 50 years.

Swiss Stocks and Bonds

Now that we have studied the historical data of Swiss stocks, we can see what happens if we add Swiss bonds to our portfolio.

We will start directly with 20 years of retirement.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 20 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 20 Years

It is very interesting to note that the worst portfolio is the portfolio with 100% stocks. Over short periods, we do not need high returns but low volatility. Therefore, bonds are quite good here. Bonds usually start to be insufficient when we raise the retirement period.

So, we continue with 30 years of retirement, a more interesting period.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 30 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 30 Years

As we expected, bonds are now providing low results in these scenarios. The bond returns are too low to sustain long periods. To see better, we can remove the two worst portfolios.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 30 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 30 Years

The results are really interesting. We can see that adding bonds helps the success rates significantly. Using 100% stocks is only better when using very aggressive withdrawal rates. The 4% rule would still work for 30 years using Swiss stocks and bonds!

We can see if we can handle 40 years.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 40 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 40 Years

Unfortunately, Swiss stocks do not provide enough returns for a 4% withdrawal rate over 40 years. It is still producing great results at a 3.50% withdrawal rate. Starting from a 3.80% withdrawal rate, the portfolio with 40% stocks is beginning not to be enough. Nevertheless, in most cases, bonds still provide a reasonable improvement for conservative withdrawal rates.

Finally, let’s complete our simulations with 50 years of retirement.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years

This simulation is quite difficult with Swiss stocks and bonds. We would need a very conservative withdrawal rate to reach a decent success rate. The portfolio with 60% bonds is failing, so we should remove it.

Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years
Retirement with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years

While these results are not great, they are also not horrible. Indeed, we could sustain 50 years of retirement with 3.50% withdrawal with either 60% or 80% Swiss stocks. I think this is an interesting result.

If you are willing to be conservative, you could retire early in Switzerland with only Swiss stocks and bonds!

Worst duration

The success rate is an interesting metric, but it is also not the only metric. In many cases, stocks do better than bonds on success rates, but they can fail early in the simulation. Therefore, another interesting metric is the worst duration of a retirement simulation.

The worst duration is the earliest a given simulation can fail. We usually measure the worst duration in months.

Here is the worst duration for our portfolios over 50 years.

Worst duration with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years
Worst duration with Swiss Stocks and Bonds - 50 Years

As expected, adding bonds to the portfolio significantly increases the worst duration. This makes sense since it is the main value of bonds to reduce volatility, which will increase the worst duration.

In the longer term, bonds are less interesting because they do not have high enough returns.

Terminal values

Finally, we can also look at the terminal values in our simulations. The terminal value is how much we are left at the end of the simulation. We can look at the average, median, and maximum terminal values. We do not show the minimum since it is almost always zero.

So, we can look at the terminal values for 40 years of retirement and a portfolio with 100% Swiss stocks. The initial value of the portfolio is 1000 CHF.

Terminal Values with 100% Swiss Stocks - 40 Years
Terminal Values with 100% Swiss Stocks - 40 Years

We can see that even with Swiss stocks, the maximum terminal values are high. With a 4% withdrawal rate, we can end up with 28 times what we started with. The average and median values are more interesting.

On average, we would end up with about eight times what we started with. This shows that we have a high margin. Some starting times make it challenging to achieve success. But on average, Swiss stocks have performed well for retiring early.

We can also look at the terminal values with 80% Swiss Stocks for the same period.

Terminal Values with 80% Swiss Stocks - 40 Years
Terminal Values with 80% Swiss Stocks - 40 Years

As expected, all the terminal values are lower. This makes sense since we are sacrificing some returns to reduce the volatility. Nevertheless, with a 4% withdrawal rate, we would still end up with about six times more than we started, which is a great result. Interestingly, the average and median values are almost the same in this result.

What about diversification?

In this article, we have only considered Swiss stocks and bonds. But should a Swiss investor only use Swiss equities? No!

Diversification is essential. We should diversify our assets since Switzerland is a tiny stock market (about 3% of the world). For that, a global world ETF is generally a good idea for most investors. So, the Swiss stocks in your portfolio should act as a home bias rather than the main part.

That being said, investors tend to be heavily biased towards their country. So, many Swiss investors will only have Swiss stocks and bonds, making this simulation quite interesting. This is also an excellent way to compare Switzerland with other countries.

If we want to run simulations with a diversified portfolio, we need to consider currency exchange. In the previous article, I ran some simulations using the CHF/USD exchange rate.

However, USD/CHF over the long has been quite hectic. Indeed, it was flat for many years because of the gold standard and the Bretton Woods system. But after Nixon killed both, the value of the USD was divided by two in about ten years.

These huge swings make it difficult to use these historical data. I think they are unlikely to repeat. I have used a forecasted exchange rate in the past, but this is not satisfying. So, for this article, I will not use it.


Overall, I am pretty happy with these results. It shows that retiring early with only Swiss stocks and bonds is possible. This requires conservative withdrawal rates and is more risky than US stocks.

The bad results from the previous simulation were greatly influenced by the data missing dividends in half the years. The results are better than I expected now that I have good data.

Again, I want to emphasize that I do not recommend having only Swiss stocks. Some level of international diversification is essential.

Now that I have this data, I will likely run more experiments in the next few months. I am thinking of trying to apply reverse glidepaths to these portfolios. I have already done some retirement simulations with social security, but I could redo them with Swiss stocks and bonds. If you have ideas, let me know in the comments below.

And if somebody knows where I could find monthly returns for Swiss stocks and bonds before 1926, let me know!

You probably have observed that the graphs have changed to a new format in this article. I have developed a simple system to generate graphs quickly from my tool into WordPress. While they are not as nice as before, these graphs save me a lot of time and are easy to translate. I would be glad to know what you think.

If you are interested in this kind of simulations, I have done retirement simulations with international stocks.

What do you think about these results?

The best financial services for your money!

Download this e-book and optimize your finances and save money by using the best financial services available in Switzerland!

Download The FREE e-book
Photo of Baptiste Wicht

Baptiste Wicht started in 2017. He realized that he was falling into the trap of lifestyle inflation. He decided to cut his expenses and increase his income. This blog is relating his story and findings. In 2019, he is saving more than 50% of his income. He made it a goal to reach Financial Independence. You can send Mr. The Poor Swiss a message here.

Recommended reading

21 thoughts on “Can you retire early with Swiss Stocks and Bonds?”

  1. Hello!

    This is slightly off-topic, but I didn’t know where it could fit better. Here I go…

    Suppose I’ve worked in Switzerland for 15 years, from 30 to 45 years old, and I stop working and leave the country at 45y.o. Suppose by that time I’ve contributed X CHF to the retirement system (feel free to split in F CHF for first pillar, S CHF for second pillar, contributions from the employer and mine, whatever you need to get me a result)…

    When I leave the country at 45 y.o. I move to another country outside the EU. The question is: 20 years later when I am 65 years old, can I start to get paid a retirement from Switzerland? I’ve asked some Swiss people, some say yes, some say no. And if yes, of course the pay will be low, but how low? Is there any way to estimate the pay from my contribution X (or any other variables like F, S, etc?)?

    Does the answer change if I move to an EU country?

    Thanks a million… I can’t find this info anywhere and I tried asking at my insurance a few times but they keep replying too technical and never go straight to the point…!


    1. Hi Luciano

      There may be some exceptions, but usually, if you move out of the country to any other country, you will be able to receive your pension payments when you are 65, regardless of how much you have contributed.
      Now, as to how much, this is impossible to answer you. The two parts (first and second pillars) will be independent. You can normally find out the payment from your second pillar on your second pillar annual summary. And there are some calculators for the first pillars, to compute how much you will receive.

      1. Thanks Baptiste. I do have the number I’ve contributed to the second pillar, from my last annual summary. Do you know what calculation I have to do?
        Thanks again!

      2. Normally, the summary should give the amount valid right now. Then you can use the current conversion rate (should also be on your summary) and multiplying these two numbers should give you your pension.

    2. Hi Luciano

      Yes, you will get your Swiss pension independent of where you live in the world. You can estimate your future payments from the first pillar on To be clear, the first pillar is a horrible investment. The IRR of the contributions and payouts is generally less than 3% p.a.

      If you have a choice, avoid the first pillar. In fact, avoid any pension system. Better be self-employed, work through your own company in a zero-tax country such as Andorra or Dubai. Save and invest privately. If you do this, your dividend income at age 65 will be 3-5x higher than the pension payments you would receive from a government.

      If this is not possible, your second-best choice is to work as an employee in a high-wage low-tax country such as Switzerland. If you can, avoid any country with capital gains taxes. These taxes have a very large impact on your investment returns.

      As for the second pillar, it would be advisable to withdraw that capital when you leave Switzerland. Then you can invest it on your own at lower cost. However, this requires that you leave to a non-EU country. To facilitate this, it is best to work with a tax advisor. I was advised by Silvan Amberg, I can highly recommend him.


      1. Thanks Karl. I did see the tool at but it doesn’t ask me for how many years I’ve contributed, and I think the number it provides is assuming maximum contribution.
        In my case it’s an important point because I expect to have contributed for around 15 years only, by when I leave the country.
        Thanks again for your help, and also for the contact.

  2. Very interesting! I think it would also be interesting to see how the typical unhedged global stock portfolio performs in CHF assuming different exchange rate regimes. For example if we assume USD loses 2% every year, or 1% etc.
    ZKB wrote an interesting article where they stated that the average loss over last 50y was around 1.2% and because the average interest rate difference was 2.7% (which would have been the appr. Hedging cost) it was better to not hedge.

    1. Thanks for sharing this article. It looks quite interesting. And funny they say that hedging is currently not necessary for several currencies because they force a lot of hedging on Frankly.

      It’s very difficult to apply such average loss properly to long term simulations. And I don’t have any hedging data for the long-term unfortunately.
      I could try to use a simple model of 1% per year loss and see how it goes.

      1. Yes totally agree that its very difficult to include hedging in a meaningful day. Its a question for us Swiss investors that complicates FIRE, especially because so much content is US centric.
        But I think at the end of the day most of the Swiss FIRE crowd will have unhedged global portfolios and therefore SWR analysis should look at this portfolio and as proposed, maybe just include a performance drag for USD depreciation.
        We also have to keep in mind that the impact is much larger if we use foreign bonds/cas rates in our analysis.
        I think it would be very interesting to look at the SWR incl. Glide paths for a global unhedged eq. Portfolio with and without simplified CHF appreciation and also using the CHF cash and bond data. Or hedged global bond data, though that is probably hard to find.
        Just a few thoughts 😊
        Keep up the good work and have a great weekend!

      2. Using a simple performance drag may make sense indeed. I have used the historical data in the past, but because of Bretton Woods and the Gold Standard, it’s difficult to imagine it would apply again today.
        I think it’s fair to imagine a 0.5 to 1.5% drag in performance because of USD these future decades, I can try to simulate that in the future!

  3. Hi Baptiste
    Have your ever consider Moonshot (private equity broker)? I see them in the Internet from time to time, did a shallow check on them, but remained sceptical. What’s your opinion?


    1. Hi Maciej,

      I never considered private equity. And I am very skeptical about the results shown by private equity brokers. I am sure there are some good deals to be done, but I doubt they are as good as advertised.
      Also, the transparency of these brokers is not great regarding fees and protection and barrier to entry is often high.
      But I have not done any checks on Moonshot.

  4. Hello Baptiste, did you include taxation in the calculation? I would estimate that income taxation reduces the dividend income by around 13-30%, depending on place of residence.

    1. Hi Karl,

      Correct, dividends are going to be reduced. But for me, this should be part of the simluation but instead part of the estimation of the expenses. From these expenses and the withdrawal, we can find our FI Number.

  5. Maybe returns from before 1926 won’t be much of help.
    Because: possibly, at those times the economy was very different from now. Just my idea.

    1. Hi Frankie,

      Indeed, economy was different. But we could imagine a huge recession having a significant impact or a different kind of economy. I think that having a wide range of history returns is good for averaging.

  6. Just because the change usd/chf was flat for the long term is wrong to think the next 10 years will be the same.
    I agree with you, you make awesome work, this blog is great help for me some time ago, i just think is good to keep in mind how the monetary policies have controlled and helped markets since 2008.
    Into the future having less currency risk in my opinion is essecial.

    Keep the good work

    1. Hi Pedro,

      I could be totally wrong indeed. But I am pretty sure we won’t see a 4x drop either. It’s important to take currency risk into account and make sure it’s okay for each personal risk capacity.

  7. Hello Baptiste, thanks so much for your analysis. I see that you did not include inflation in this calculation. What about comparing the return on Swiss stocks with the increase on rental private properties in Switzerland as the “real inflation rate”, since 60% of the population rents and it is usually the biggest expense a family has? I believe 4% in this case would not be enough.. What do you think? Regards, Lucas

    1. What makes you say I did not include inflation in this calculation? As mentioned in the article, inflation IS included in the calculation.
      If you have monthly historical data for rent prices, this could be interesting, but without data, there is not much I can do. And since inflation is included in my simulations, I think this is taken into account.

      1. Hello Baptiste. Thanks for your reply and sorry about that, my mistake. I only read later the part that you included inflation in the calculation. Yeah, that would be great with the data, but I also haven’t found it.. If I find it, I will let you know. Regards

Leave a Reply

Your comment may not appear instantly since it has to go through moderation. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *